(better)įrom that here is a table of percentages and bankrolls. I would guess you played way more than 90 hands.Īnd about 360 hands per 90 minutes. Since I played for 90 minutes (and more than 90 hands), I did not hit anything above a four of a kind due to the low probabilities of the higher return combinations.Unless you were doing some other things while playing VP, like other things, On any given hand you could get a royal that would add $1000 to your total return (you are playing quarters, right?) Until you are at the point where what $1000 would barely move your percent return, it's not reasonable to think that your return would be close to expectation - while a single hand can still make it swing around, it hasn't stabilized yet. The more hands you play, the more likely it becomes that your actual results are close to the expectation (when expressed as a percentage).Ī few hundred hands is a very small sample, your results could be anywhere from way below expectation to way above expectation. No, the figure is not derived through simulation of a lot of hands. I cannot find this information on his website, but is he calculating a certain amount of hands to achieve this 100.76 figure? Since I played for 90 minutes (and more than 90 hands), I did not hit anything above a four of a kind due to the low probabilities of the higher return combinations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |